--- title: "Codemagic vs GitHub Actions: Which is searched more?" description: "Is Codemagic or GitHub Actions more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Mobile CI platforms set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/codemagic-vs-github-actions" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Codemagic vs GitHub Actions: Which is searched more? Is Codemagic or GitHub Actions more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Mobile CI platforms set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: Codemagic and GitHub Actions - **Competitive set**: Mobile CI platforms - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **Codemagic Share of Search**: 7.6% - **GitHub Actions Share of Search**: 20.8% ## Is Codemagic or GitHub Actions more popular in search? - In September 2026, GitHub Actions had more branded searches than Codemagic among mobile CI platforms worldwide. GitHub Actions had about 90,500 branded searches, while Codemagic had 33,100. GitHub Actions made up 20.8% of all mobile CI platform searches we track, and Codemagic accounted for 7.6%. - GitHub Actions was ahead of Codemagic in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Codemagic’s share of searches among mobile CI platforms worldwide moved from 3.5% to 7.6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 14.8K to 33.1K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, GitHub Actions’ share of searches among mobile CI platforms worldwide moved from 21.7% to 20.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 90.5K. ## Top mobile CI platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, both Codemagic and GitHub Actions showed up in all five answers. Codemagic was listed before GitHub Actions in four of them. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Bitrise | 1st | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | Codemagic | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | GitHub Actions | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | EAS | 4th | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | Xcode Cloud | 5th | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | Fastlane | 6th | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | Appcircle | 7th | 2 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 3 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about mobile CI platforms - Asked ChatGPT "Which mobile CI platform should I use?": 1. EAS, 2. Bitrise, 3. Codemagic, 4. GitHub Actions, 5. Xcode Cloud, 6. Fastlane - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best mobile CI platforms?": 1. Bitrise, 2. Codemagic, 3. GitHub Actions, 4. EAS, 5. Xcode Cloud, 6. Appcircle, 7. Fastlane - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best mobile CI platform for mobile app builds?": 1. Bitrise, 2. Codemagic, 3. GitHub Actions, 4. Fastlane, 5. EAS, 6. Xcode Cloud, 7. Appcircle - Searched Google, AI Overview "mobile ci tool": 1. Bitrise, 2. Codemagic, 3. GitHub Actions, 4. Xcode Cloud, 5. Appcircle, 6. EAS - Searched Google, AI Overview "ci for mobile apps": 1. Bitrise, 2. GitHub Actions, 3. Codemagic, 4. Fastlane Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for mobile CI platforms worldwide in September 2026? - In September 2026, Codemagic gained share of searches among mobile CI platforms worldwide, from 7% to 7.6%. - In September 2026, GitHub Actions lost share of searches among mobile CI platforms worldwide, from 23.2% to 20.8%. ## Month by month | Month | Codemagic estimated searches | Codemagic Share of Search | Codemagic rank | GitHub Actions estimated searches | GitHub Actions Share of Search | GitHub Actions rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 14.8K | 3.5% | 5 | 90.5K | 21.7% | 3 | | Nov 2025 | 14.8K | 3.5% | 5 | 90.5K | 21.7% | 3 | | Dec 2025 | 14.8K | 3.6% | 4 | 90.5K | 21.8% | 3 | | Jan 2026 | 18.1K | 4.3% | 4 | 90.5K | 21.4% | 3 | | Feb 2026 | 18.1K | 4.3% | 4 | 90.5K | 21.6% | 3 | | Mar 2026 | 27.1K | 5.2% | 4 | 135K | 25.9% | 2 | | Apr 2026 | 27.1K | 5.5% | 4 | 110K | 22.3% | 2 | | May 2026 | 27.1K | 5.3% | 4 | 110K | 21.5% | 3 | | Jun 2026 | 27.1K | 6% | 4 | 90.5K | 20.1% | 3 | | Jul 2026 | 33.1K | 7.3% | 4 | 90.5K | 19.9% | 3 | | Aug 2026 | 33.1K | 7% | 4 | 110K | 23.2% | 3 | | Sep 2026 | 33.1K | 7.6% | 4 | 90.5K | 20.8% | 3 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Codemagic’s and GitHub Actions’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **Codemagic**: Measured on the search term “codemagic”. - **GitHub Actions**: Measured on the search term “github actions”. - [Codemagic profile](/demand/global-en/brands/codemagic) - [GitHub Actions profile](/demand/global-en/brands/github-actions) - [All mobile CI platforms worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/mobile-ci-platforms): The set both shares are measured inside, 7 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is Codemagic or GitHub Actions more popular in search? In September 2026, GitHub Actions had more branded searches than Codemagic among mobile CI platforms worldwide. GitHub Actions had about 90,500 branded searches, while Codemagic had 33,100. GitHub Actions made up 20.8% of all mobile CI platform searches we track, and Codemagic accounted for 7.6%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Codemagic vs GitHub Actions: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/codemagic-vs-github-actions This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/codemagic-vs-github-actions. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.