---
title: "Clek vs Cybex: Which is searched more?"
description: "Is Clek or Cybex more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Child car seat brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time."
canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/clek-vs-cybex"
publisher: "Brandwave"
---

# Clek vs Cybex: Which is searched more?

Is Clek or Cybex more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Child car seat brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.

## Key facts

- **Compared**: Clek and Cybex
- **Competitive set**: Child car seat brands
- **Market**: Global
- **Month measured**: Sep 2026
- **Clek Share of Search**: 0.78%
- **Cybex Share of Search**: 27.4%

## Is Clek or Cybex more popular in search?

- In September 2026, Cybex had more branded searches than Clek among child car seat brands worldwide. Cybex had about 478,000 branded searches, while Clek had 13,500. Cybex made up 27.4% of all child car seat brand searches we track, and Clek accounted for 0.78%.
- Cybex was ahead of Clek in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Clek’s share of searches among child car seat brands worldwide moved from 0.83% to 0.78%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 14.7K to 13.5K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Cybex’s share of searches among child car seat brands worldwide moved from 26.2% to 27.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 467K to 478K.

## Top child car seat brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and one Google AI Overview, Clek was mentioned in three out of four: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in the Google AI Overview. Cybex did not appear in any of the four answers.

Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options.

| Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Graco | 1st | 3 of 3 | 1 of 1 | 4 of 4 |
| Chicco | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 1 | 4 of 4 |
| Britax | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 1 | 4 of 4 |
| Nuna | 4th | 2 of 3 | 1 of 1 | 3 of 4 |
| Clek | 5th | 2 of 3 | 1 of 1 | 3 of 4 |
| Evenflo | 6th | 1 of 3 | 1 of 1 | 2 of 4 |
| Cybex | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 |
| Maxi-Cosi | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 |
| Joie | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 |

## Every AI answer about child car seat brands

- Asked ChatGPT "Which child car seat brand should I buy?": 1. Graco, 2. Britax, 3. Chicco, 4. Nuna
- Asked ChatGPT "What are the best child car seat brands?": 1. Chicco, 2. Britax, 3. Graco, 4. Nuna, 5. Clek, 6. Evenflo
- Asked ChatGPT "What's the best child car seat brand for a growing child?": 1. Graco, 2. Britax, 3. Chicco, 4. Clek
- Searched Google, AI Overview "infant car seat brands": 1. Nuna, 2. Chicco, 3. Graco, 4. Britax, 5. Clek, 6. Evenflo

Not named in any answer: Cybex, Maxi-Cosi and Joie.

Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 20, 2026.

## How did search popularity change for child car seat brands worldwide in September 2026?

Neither Clek nor Cybex moved beyond provider rounding among child car seat brands in Sep 2026.

## Month by month

| Month | Clek estimated searches | Clek Share of Search | Clek rank | Cybex estimated searches | Cybex Share of Search | Cybex rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oct 2025 | 14.7K | 0.83% | 7 | 467K | 26.2% | 1 |
| Nov 2025 | 19.8K | 0.9% | 7 | 569K | 25.8% | 1 |
| Dec 2025 | 12K | 0.78% | 7 | 390K | 25.4% | 2 |
| Jan 2026 | 14.7K | 0.73% | 7 | 569K | 28.3% | 1 |
| Feb 2026 | 13.5K | 0.82% | 7 | 467K | 28.5% | 1 |
| Mar 2026 | 16.5K | 0.87% | 7 | 560K | 29.7% | 1 |
| Apr 2026 | 16.5K | 0.93% | 7 | 476K | 26.7% | 1 |
| May 2026 | 13.5K | 0.77% | 7 | 476K | 27.3% | 1 |
| Jun 2026 | 13.5K | 0.8% | 7 | 476K | 28.3% | 1 |
| Jul 2026 | 14.7K | 0.87% | 7 | 476K | 28.3% | 1 |
| Aug 2026 | 16.5K | 0.93% | 7 | 484K | 27.2% | 1 |
| Sep 2026 | 13.5K | 0.78% | 7 | 478K | 27.4% | 1 |

## How each brand is measured

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Clek’s and Cybex’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

- **Clek**: Measured on the search terms “clek” and “clek car seat”, summed into one figure.
- **Cybex**: Measured on the search terms “car seat cybex”, “cybex”, “cybex cloud”, “cybex sirona” and “cybex solution”, summed into one figure.

- [Clek profile](/demand/global-en/brands/clek)
- [Cybex profile](/demand/global-en/brands/cybex)
- [All child car seat brands worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/child-car-seat-brands): The set both shares are measured inside, 9 brands.

## Methodology

- [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused.

## Frequently asked questions

### Is Clek or Cybex more popular in search?

In September 2026, Cybex had more branded searches than Clek among child car seat brands worldwide. Cybex had about 478,000 branded searches, while Clek had 13,500. Cybex made up 27.4% of all child car seat brand searches we track, and Clek accounted for 0.78%.

## Cite this page

Brandwave. "Clek vs Cybex: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/clek-vs-cybex

This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/clek-vs-cybex. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.
