--- title: "Amphion vs TranscribeMe: Which is searched more?" description: "Is Amphion or TranscribeMe more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Medical transcription services set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/amphion-vs-transcribeme" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Amphion vs TranscribeMe: Which is searched more? Is Amphion or TranscribeMe more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Medical transcription services set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: Amphion and TranscribeMe - **Competitive set**: Medical transcription services - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **Amphion Share of Search**: 4.9% - **TranscribeMe Share of Search**: 45.1% ## Is Amphion or TranscribeMe more popular in search? - In September 2026, TranscribeMe had more branded searches than Amphion among medical transcription services worldwide. TranscribeMe had about 135,000 branded searches, while Amphion had 14,800. TranscribeMe made up 45.1% of all medical transcription service searches we track, and Amphion accounted for 4.9%. - TranscribeMe was ahead of Amphion in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Amphion’s share of searches among medical transcription services worldwide moved from 8.5% to 4.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 22.2K to 14.8K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, TranscribeMe’s share of searches among medical transcription services worldwide moved from 41.9% to 45.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 110K to 135K. ## Top medical transcription services in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and one Google AI Overview, TranscribeMe was mentioned in two out of four: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in the Google AI Overview. Amphion did not appear in any of the four answers. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Nabla | 1st | 2 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 2 of 4 | | TranscribeMe | 2nd | 2 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 2 of 4 | | Freed | 3rd | 2 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 2 of 4 | | Dragon Medical One | 4th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 2 of 4 | | TranscribeMD | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 | | Amphion | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 | | iMedX | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 | | M*Modal | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 | | Nuance | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 | ## Every AI answer about medical transcription services - Asked ChatGPT "Which medical transcription service should I use?": 1. Nabla, 2. TranscribeMe, 3. Dragon Medical One - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best medical transcription services?": 1. TranscribeMe, 2. Freed, 3. Dragon Medical One - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best medical transcription service for clinical notes?": 1. Nabla, 2. Freed - Searched Google, AI Overview "medical transcription services": named none of the brands we track Not named in any answer: TranscribeMD, Amphion, iMedX, M*Modal and Nuance. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for medical transcription services worldwide in September 2026? - In September 2026, Amphion gained share of searches among medical transcription services worldwide, from 4.1% to 4.9%. - Estimated monthly branded searches for TranscribeMe worldwide rose 22.7% over 12 measured months, from 110K to 135K in September 2026. ## Month by month | Month | Amphion estimated searches | Amphion Share of Search | Amphion rank | TranscribeMe estimated searches | TranscribeMe Share of Search | TranscribeMe rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 22.2K | 8.5% | 3 | 110K | 41.9% | 2 | | Nov 2025 | 22.2K | 8.6% | 3 | 110K | 42.6% | 2 | | Dec 2025 | 18.1K | 8.3% | 3 | 90.5K | 41.6% | 2 | | Jan 2026 | 22.2K | 7.1% | 3 | 135K | 43.1% | 2 | | Feb 2026 | 18.1K | 7.1% | 3 | 110K | 43.2% | 2 | | Mar 2026 | 22.2K | 7.1% | 3 | 135K | 43.2% | 2 | | Apr 2026 | 22.2K | 6% | 3 | 165K | 44.7% | 2 | | May 2026 | 33.1K | 10.4% | 3 | 135K | 42.3% | 2 | | Jun 2026 | 14.8K | 4.9% | 3 | 135K | 44.9% | 2 | | Jul 2026 | 9.9K | 2.8% | 3 | 165K | 45.9% | 2 | | Aug 2026 | 12.1K | 4.1% | 3 | 135K | 45.5% | 2 | | Sep 2026 | 14.8K | 4.9% | 3 | 135K | 45.1% | 2 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Amphion’s and TranscribeMe’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **Amphion**: Measured on the search term “amphion”. - **TranscribeMe**: Measured on the search term “transcribeme”. - [Amphion profile](/demand/global-en/brands/amphion) - [TranscribeMe profile](/demand/global-en/brands/transcribeme) - [All medical transcription services worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/medical-transcription-services): The set both shares are measured inside, 9 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is Amphion or TranscribeMe more popular in search? In September 2026, TranscribeMe had more branded searches than Amphion among medical transcription services worldwide. TranscribeMe had about 135,000 branded searches, while Amphion had 14,800. TranscribeMe made up 45.1% of all medical transcription service searches we track, and Amphion accounted for 4.9%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Amphion vs TranscribeMe: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/amphion-vs-transcribeme This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/amphion-vs-transcribeme. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.