--- title: "Amazon Textract vs Nanonets: Which is searched more?" description: "Is Amazon Textract or Nanonets more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the AI document processing platforms set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/amazon-textract-vs-nanonets" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Amazon Textract vs Nanonets: Which is searched more? Is Amazon Textract or Nanonets more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the AI document processing platforms set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: Amazon Textract and Nanonets - **Competitive set**: AI document processing platforms - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **Amazon Textract Share of Search**: 9.4% - **Nanonets Share of Search**: 10.4% ## Is Amazon Textract or Nanonets more popular in search? - In September 2026, Nanonets had more branded searches than Amazon Textract among AI document processing platforms worldwide. Nanonets had about 9,900 branded searches, while Amazon Textract had 9,000. Nanonets made up 10.4% of all AI document processing platform searches we track, and Amazon Textract accounted for 9.4%. - The lead changed hands 5 times in the 12 months ending September 2026: Nanonets took it in December 2025, Amazon Textract took it in January 2026, Nanonets took it in March 2026, Amazon Textract took it in April 2026, Nanonets took it in May 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Amazon Textract’s share of searches among AI document processing platforms worldwide moved from 13.8% to 9.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 18K to 9K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Nanonets’ share of searches among AI document processing platforms worldwide moved from 9.3% to 10.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 12.1K to 9.9K. ## Top AI document processing platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Amazon Textract was mentioned in four out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Nanonets was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Amazon Textract was listed before Nanonets in three out of four answers that named either. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Azure AI Document Intelligence | 1st | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | Google Document AI | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | ABBYY | 3rd | 2 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | Amazon Textract | 4th | 2 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | Nanonets | 5th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 | | Rossum | 6th | 1 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Hyperscience | 7th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 | | Klippa | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Docsumo | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Affinda | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about AI document processing platforms - Asked ChatGPT "Which AI document processing platform should I use?": 1. Azure AI Document Intelligence, 2. ABBYY, 3. Google Document AI, 4. Amazon Textract - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best AI document processing platforms?": 1. Azure AI Document Intelligence, 2. Google Document AI, 3. ABBYY, 4. Nanonets, 5. Amazon Textract, 6. Rossum, 7. Hyperscience - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best AI document processing platform for reading documents?": 1. Azure AI Document Intelligence, 2. Google Document AI - Searched Google, AI Overview "ai document processing": 1. Google Document AI, 2. Amazon Textract, 3. Azure AI Document Intelligence - Searched Google, AI Overview "document processing software": 1. ABBYY, 2. Azure AI Document Intelligence, 3. Google Document AI, 4. Amazon Textract, 5. Rossum Not named in any answer: Klippa, Docsumo and Affinda. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 20, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for AI document processing platforms worldwide in September 2026? - Estimated monthly branded searches for Amazon Textract worldwide fell 50% over 12 measured months, from 18K to 9K in September 2026. - Estimated monthly branded searches for Nanonets worldwide fell 18.2% over 12 measured months, from 12.1K to 9.9K in September 2026. ## Month by month | Month | Amazon Textract estimated searches | Amazon Textract Share of Search | Amazon Textract rank | Nanonets estimated searches | Nanonets Share of Search | Nanonets rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 18K | 13.8% | 3 | 12.1K | 9.3% | 6 | | Nov 2025 | 14.7K | 12.2% | 4 | 12.1K | 10.1% | 6 | | Dec 2025 | 12K | 11.3% | 6 | 12.1K | 11.3% | 5 | | Jan 2026 | 13.5K | 11.4% | 5 | 12.1K | 10.3% | 6 | | Feb 2026 | 13.5K | 11.7% | 5 | 12.1K | 10.5% | 6 | | Mar 2026 | 13.5K | 10.6% | 6 | 14.8K | 11.6% | 5 | | Apr 2026 | 13.5K | 11.3% | 5 | 12.1K | 10.1% | 6 | | May 2026 | 11K | 9.9% | 6 | 12.1K | 10.9% | 5 | | Jun 2026 | 10.2K | 9.3% | 6 | 12.1K | 11.1% | 5 | | Jul 2026 | 9K | 8.2% | 6 | 12.1K | 11.1% | 5 | | Aug 2026 | 9K | 9.4% | 6 | 9.9K | 10.3% | 5 | | Sep 2026 | 9K | 9.4% | 6 | 9.9K | 10.4% | 5 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Amazon Textract’s and Nanonets’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **Amazon Textract**: Measured on the search terms “amazon textract” and “aws textract”, summed into one figure. - **Nanonets**: Measured on the search term “nanonets”. - [Amazon Textract profile](/demand/global-en/brands/amazon-textract) - [Nanonets profile](/demand/global-en/brands/nanonets) - [All AI document processing platforms worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/ai-document-processing-platforms): The set both shares are measured inside, 10 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is Amazon Textract or Nanonets more popular in search? In September 2026, Nanonets had more branded searches than Amazon Textract among AI document processing platforms worldwide. Nanonets had about 9,900 branded searches, while Amazon Textract had 9,000. Nanonets made up 10.4% of all AI document processing platform searches we track, and Amazon Textract accounted for 9.4%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Amazon Textract vs Nanonets: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/amazon-textract-vs-nanonets This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/amazon-textract-vs-nanonets. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.