---
title: "Time tracking platforms: Which brands are most popular in search?"
description: "Compare services and tools used to track working time for projects and billing. Share of Search among Clockify, Hubstaff, Toggl Track, Everhour and Harvest, the time tracking platforms Brandwave compares worldwide, using the same methodology, market, and reporting period. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time."
canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/time-tracking-platforms"
publisher: "Brandwave"
---

# Time tracking platforms: Which brands are most popular in search?

Compare services and tools used to track working time for projects and billing. Share of Search among Clockify, Hubstaff, Toggl Track, Everhour and Harvest, the time tracking platforms Brandwave compares worldwide, using the same methodology, market, and reporting period. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.

## Key facts

- **Competitive set**: Time tracking platforms
- **Market**: Global
- **Brands compared**: 5
- **Month measured**: Aug 2026
- **Highest Share of Search**: Clockify, 56.8%

## Which brand is most popular in search among time tracking platforms worldwide?

- In August 2026, Clockify was the most searched among time tracking platforms worldwide, with an estimated 257K branded searches and 56.8% estimated Share of Search within this set.
- Hubstaff is in 2nd place, 32 percentage points behind at 24.7% Share of Search.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Clockify’s estimated Share of Search among time tracking platforms worldwide decreased from 63.4% to 56.8%.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Hubstaff’s estimated Share of Search among time tracking platforms worldwide increased from 22.5% to 24.7%.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Toggl Track’s estimated Share of Search among time tracking platforms worldwide increased from 10.4% to 14.8%.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Clockify’s estimated Share of Search among time tracking platforms worldwide peaked at 63.4% in October 2025 and was lowest at 55.3% in March 2026.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Hubstaff’s estimated Share of Search among time tracking platforms worldwide peaked at 29.9% in December 2025 and was lowest at 22.3% in January 2026.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Toggl Track’s estimated Share of Search among time tracking platforms worldwide peaked at 15% in July 2026 and was lowest at 10.4% in October 2025.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Everhour and Harvest held steady: their estimated Share of Search among time tracking platforms worldwide each moved less than 0.5 percentage points.

## Compare search popularity between leading brands

- [Clockify vs Hubstaff: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/clockify-vs-hubstaff): 56.8% against 24.7% Share of Search.
- [Clockify vs Toggl Track: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/clockify-vs-toggl-track): 56.8% against 14.8% Share of Search.
- [Hubstaff vs Toggl Track: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/hubstaff-vs-toggl-track): 24.7% against 14.8% Share of Search.

## How did search popularity change for time tracking platforms worldwide in August 2026?

- In August 2026, Everhour rose from 5th to 4th among time tracking platforms worldwide.
- In August 2026, Harvest fell from 4th to 5th among time tracking platforms worldwide.
- Estimated monthly branded searches for Clockify worldwide fell 33.5% over 11 measured months, from 386K to 257K in August 2026.
- Estimated monthly branded searches for Hubstaff worldwide fell 18.4% over 11 measured months, from 137K to 112K in August 2026.

## Share of Search ranking

| Rank | Brand | Share of Search | Estimated monthly branded searches | Change vs prior month | Owned by |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Clockify | 56.8% | 257K | -0.4% | Clockify |
| 2 | Hubstaff | 24.7% | 112K | -0.2% | Hubstaff |
| 3 | Toggl Track | 14.8% | 67.2K | -2.0% | Toggl Track |
| 4 | Everhour | 1.8% | 8.3K | 0.0% | Everhour |
| 5 | Harvest | 1.8% | 8.2K | -18.0% | Harvest |

## Historical estimated branded-search demand

| Month | Brand | Estimated monthly branded searches | Share of Search | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oct 2025 | Clockify | 386K | 63.4% | 1 |
| Oct 2025 | Hubstaff | 137K | 22.5% | 2 |
| Oct 2025 | Toggl Track | 63.5K | 10.4% | 3 |
| Oct 2025 | Everhour | 12.4K | 2% | 4 |
| Oct 2025 | Harvest | 10K | 1.6% | 5 |
| Nov 2025 | Clockify | 314K | 58.6% | 1 |
| Nov 2025 | Hubstaff | 138K | 25.8% | 2 |
| Nov 2025 | Toggl Track | 63.7K | 11.9% | 3 |
| Nov 2025 | Everhour | 10.1K | 1.9% | 4 |
| Nov 2025 | Harvest | 10K | 1.9% | 5 |
| Dec 2025 | Clockify | 313K | 55.5% | 1 |
| Dec 2025 | Hubstaff | 169K | 29.9% | 2 |
| Dec 2025 | Toggl Track | 65.4K | 11.6% | 3 |
| Dec 2025 | Everhour | 8.4K | 1.5% | 4 |
| Dec 2025 | Harvest | 8.2K | 1.5% | 5 |
| Jan 2026 | Clockify | 384K | 62.1% | 1 |
| Jan 2026 | Hubstaff | 138K | 22.3% | 2 |
| Jan 2026 | Toggl Track | 77K | 12.4% | 3 |
| Jan 2026 | Everhour | 10.2K | 1.6% | 4 |
| Jan 2026 | Harvest | 10K | 1.6% | 5 |
| Feb 2026 | Clockify | 317K | 58.8% | 1 |
| Feb 2026 | Hubstaff | 138K | 25.6% | 2 |
| Feb 2026 | Toggl Track | 64.2K | 11.9% | 3 |
| Feb 2026 | Everhour | 10.1K | 1.9% | 4 |
| Feb 2026 | Harvest | 10K | 1.9% | 5 |
| Mar 2026 | Clockify | 318K | 55.3% | 1 |
| Mar 2026 | Hubstaff | 168K | 29.3% | 2 |
| Mar 2026 | Toggl Track | 66.4K | 11.5% | 3 |
| Mar 2026 | Harvest | 12.2K | 2.1% | 4 |
| Mar 2026 | Everhour | 10.2K | 1.8% | 5 |
| Apr 2026 | Clockify | 317K | 55.9% | 1 |
| Apr 2026 | Hubstaff | 168K | 29.7% | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | Toggl Track | 63.7K | 11.2% | 3 |
| Apr 2026 | Harvest | 10K | 1.8% | 4 |
| Apr 2026 | Everhour | 8.3K | 1.5% | 5 |
| May 2026 | Clockify | 317K | 58.9% | 1 |
| May 2026 | Hubstaff | 138K | 25.6% | 2 |
| May 2026 | Toggl Track | 65.5K | 12.2% | 3 |
| May 2026 | Harvest | 10K | 1.9% | 4 |
| May 2026 | Everhour | 8.3K | 1.5% | 5 |
| Jun 2026 | Clockify | 313K | 58% | 1 |
| Jun 2026 | Hubstaff | 137K | 25.4% | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | Toggl Track | 68.7K | 12.7% | 3 |
| Jun 2026 | Harvest | 12.2K | 2.3% | 4 |
| Jun 2026 | Everhour | 8.3K | 1.5% | 5 |
| Jul 2026 | Clockify | 258K | 56.4% | 1 |
| Jul 2026 | Hubstaff | 112K | 24.6% | 2 |
| Jul 2026 | Toggl Track | 68.6K | 15% | 3 |
| Jul 2026 | Harvest | 10K | 2.2% | 4 |
| Jul 2026 | Everhour | 8.3K | 1.8% | 5 |
| Aug 2026 | Clockify | 257K | 56.8% | 1 |
| Aug 2026 | Hubstaff | 112K | 24.7% | 2 |
| Aug 2026 | Toggl Track | 67.2K | 14.8% | 3 |
| Aug 2026 | Everhour | 8.3K | 1.8% | 4 |
| Aug 2026 | Harvest | 8.2K | 1.8% | 5 |
| Sep 2026 | Clockify | — | — | — |
| Sep 2026 | Everhour | — | — | — |
| Sep 2026 | Harvest | — | — | — |
| Sep 2026 | Hubstaff | — | — | — |
| Sep 2026 | Toggl Track | — | — | — |

## What is being compared

- **Clockify**: Measured on the search terms “clockify”, “clockify app”, “clockify me”, “clockify online”, “clockify software”, “clockify time tracking” and “time tracking clockify”, summed into one figure.
- **Everhour**: Measured on the search terms “everhour”, “everhour app”, “everhour com”, “everhour time tracking” and “time tracking everhour”, summed into one figure.
- **Harvest**: Measured on the search terms “getharvest com” and “harvest time tracking”, summed into one figure.
- **Hubstaff**: Measured on the search terms “hubstaff”, “hubstaff app”, “hubstaff com”, “hubstaff online”, “hubstaff software”, “hubstaff time tracking” and “time tracking hubstaff”, summed into one figure.
- **Toggl Track**: Measured on the search terms “toggl com”, “toggl track”, “toggl track app”, “toggl track software”, “toggl track time tracking” and “toggltrack”, summed into one figure.

- [Clockify](/demand/global-en/brands/clockify)
- [Everhour](/demand/global-en/brands/everhour)
- [Harvest](/demand/global-en/brands/harvest-time)
- [Hubstaff](/demand/global-en/brands/hubstaff)
- [Toggl Track](/demand/global-en/brands/toggl-track)

## Methodology

- [How is branded search demand measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which brand is most popular in search among time tracking platforms worldwide?

In August 2026, Clockify was the most searched among time tracking platforms worldwide, with an estimated 257K branded searches and 56.8% estimated Share of Search within this set. Worldwide · English terms: these are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms.

## Cite this page

Brandwave. "Time tracking platforms: Which brands are most popular in search?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/time-tracking-platforms

This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/time-tracking-platforms. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.
