--- title: "Smart ring brands: Which brands are most popular in search?" description: "Compare brands that offers smart rings for tracking activity and wellness. Share of Search among Oura, RingConn, Samsung Galaxy Ring, Ultrahuman and Circular, the smart ring brands Brandwave compares worldwide, using the same methodology, market, and reporting period. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/smart-ring-brands" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Smart ring brands: Which brands are most popular in search? Compare brands that offers smart rings for tracking activity and wellness. Share of Search among Oura, RingConn, Samsung Galaxy Ring, Ultrahuman and Circular, the smart ring brands Brandwave compares worldwide, using the same methodology, market, and reporting period. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Competitive set**: Smart ring brands - **Market**: Global - **Brands compared**: 5 - **Month measured**: Aug 2026 - **Highest Share of Search**: Oura, 80.8% ## Which brand is most popular in search among smart ring brands worldwide? - In August 2026, Oura was the most searched among smart ring brands worldwide, with an estimated 3.5M branded searches and 80.8% estimated Share of Search within this set. - RingConn is in 2nd place, 72.9 percentage points behind at 8% Share of Search. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Oura’s estimated Share of Search among smart ring brands worldwide increased from 79.1% to 80.8%. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, RingConn’s estimated Share of Search among smart ring brands worldwide increased from 6.4% to 8%. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Samsung Galaxy Ring’s estimated Share of Search among smart ring brands worldwide decreased from 8.8% to 6.6%. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Ultrahuman’s estimated Share of Search among smart ring brands worldwide decreased from 5.4% to 4.4%. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Oura’s estimated Share of Search among smart ring brands worldwide peaked at 83.3% in June 2026 and was lowest at 75.5% in January 2026. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, RingConn’s estimated Share of Search among smart ring brands worldwide peaked at 11.3% in January 2026 and was lowest at 6.4% in October 2025. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Samsung Galaxy Ring’s estimated Share of Search among smart ring brands worldwide peaked at 8.8% in October 2025 and was lowest at 4.6% in June 2026. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Ultrahuman’s estimated Share of Search among smart ring brands worldwide peaked at 6.3% in November 2025 and was lowest at 3.5% in July 2026. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, RingConn rose from 3rd to 2nd among smart ring brands worldwide. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Samsung Galaxy Ring fell from 2nd to 3rd among smart ring brands worldwide. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Circular held steady: its estimated Share of Search among smart ring brands worldwide moved less than 0.5 percentage points. ## Compare search popularity between leading brands - [Oura vs RingConn: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/oura-vs-ringconn): 80.8% against 8% Share of Search. - [Oura vs Samsung Galaxy Ring: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/oura-vs-samsung-galaxy-ring): 80.8% against 6.6% Share of Search. - [Oura vs Ultrahuman: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/oura-vs-ultrahuman): 80.8% against 4.4% Share of Search. - [RingConn vs Samsung Galaxy Ring: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/ringconn-vs-samsung-galaxy-ring): 8% against 6.6% Share of Search. - [RingConn vs Ultrahuman: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/ringconn-vs-ultrahuman): 8% against 4.4% Share of Search. - [Samsung Galaxy Ring vs Ultrahuman: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/samsung-galaxy-ring-vs-ultrahuman): 6.6% against 4.4% Share of Search. ## How did search popularity change for smart ring brands worldwide in August 2026? - In August 2026, Samsung Galaxy Ring gained estimated Share of Search among smart ring brands worldwide, from 5.5% to 6.6%. - In August 2026, Ultrahuman gained estimated Share of Search among smart ring brands worldwide, from 3.5% to 4.4%. - In August 2026, Oura lost estimated Share of Search among smart ring brands worldwide, from 82.8% to 80.8%. - RingConn’s estimated Share of Search among smart ring brands worldwide has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 10.1% to 8% in August 2026. - Estimated monthly branded searches for Circular worldwide fell 33.7% over 11 measured months, from 13.2K to 8.8K in August 2026. ## Share of Search ranking | Rank | Brand | Share of Search | Estimated monthly branded searches | Change vs prior month | Owned by | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | Oura | 80.8% | 3.5M | -19.2% | Oura | | 2 | RingConn | 8% | 346K | -17.7% | RingConn | | 3 | Samsung Galaxy Ring | 6.6% | 288K | 0.0% | Samsung | | 4 | Ultrahuman | 4.4% | 190K | +3.0% | Ultrahuman | | 5 | Circular | 0.2% | 8.8K | -1.5% | Circular | ## Historical estimated branded-search demand | Month | Brand | Estimated monthly branded searches | Share of Search | Rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | Oura | 3.4M | 79.1% | 1 | | Oct 2025 | Samsung Galaxy Ring | 385K | 8.8% | 2 | | Oct 2025 | RingConn | 279K | 6.4% | 3 | | Oct 2025 | Ultrahuman | 236K | 5.4% | 4 | | Oct 2025 | Circular | 13.2K | 0.3% | 5 | | Nov 2025 | Oura | 5M | 80.2% | 1 | | Nov 2025 | RingConn | 446K | 7.1% | 2 | | Nov 2025 | Ultrahuman | 397K | 6.3% | 3 | | Nov 2025 | Samsung Galaxy Ring | 390K | 6.2% | 4 | | Nov 2025 | Circular | 13.5K | 0.21% | 5 | | Dec 2025 | Oura | 5.3M | 78.4% | 1 | | Dec 2025 | RingConn | 641K | 9.5% | 2 | | Dec 2025 | Ultrahuman | 411K | 6.1% | 3 | | Dec 2025 | Samsung Galaxy Ring | 390K | 5.8% | 4 | | Dec 2025 | Circular | 13.8K | 0.21% | 5 | | Jan 2026 | Oura | 4.1M | 75.5% | 1 | | Jan 2026 | RingConn | 621K | 11.3% | 2 | | Jan 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Ring | 376K | 6.9% | 3 | | Jan 2026 | Ultrahuman | 336K | 6.1% | 4 | | Jan 2026 | Circular | 11.3K | 0.21% | 5 | | Feb 2026 | Oura | 3.3M | 77.7% | 1 | | Feb 2026 | RingConn | 439K | 10.3% | 2 | | Feb 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Ring | 294K | 6.9% | 3 | | Feb 2026 | Ultrahuman | 211K | 4.9% | 4 | | Feb 2026 | Circular | 11K | 0.26% | 5 | | Mar 2026 | Oura | 3.4M | 77.4% | 1 | | Mar 2026 | RingConn | 428K | 9.8% | 2 | | Mar 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Ring | 294K | 6.7% | 3 | | Mar 2026 | Ultrahuman | 259K | 5.9% | 4 | | Mar 2026 | Circular | 9.2K | 0.21% | 5 | | Apr 2026 | Oura | 3.3M | 79.9% | 1 | | Apr 2026 | RingConn | 357K | 8.6% | 2 | | Apr 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Ring | 261K | 6.3% | 3 | | Apr 2026 | Ultrahuman | 211K | 5.1% | 4 | | Apr 2026 | Circular | 8.9K | 0.21% | 5 | | May 2026 | Oura | 3.9M | 79.8% | 1 | | May 2026 | RingConn | 494K | 10.1% | 2 | | May 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Ring | 261K | 5.3% | 3 | | May 2026 | Ultrahuman | 220K | 4.5% | 4 | | May 2026 | Circular | 8.9K | 0.18% | 5 | | Jun 2026 | Oura | 5M | 83.3% | 1 | | Jun 2026 | RingConn | 504K | 8.4% | 2 | | Jun 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Ring | 272K | 4.6% | 3 | | Jun 2026 | Ultrahuman | 212K | 3.5% | 4 | | Jun 2026 | Circular | 8.9K | 0.15% | 5 | | Jul 2026 | Oura | 4.3M | 82.8% | 1 | | Jul 2026 | RingConn | 420K | 8% | 2 | | Jul 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Ring | 288K | 5.5% | 3 | | Jul 2026 | Ultrahuman | 184K | 3.5% | 4 | | Jul 2026 | Circular | 8.9K | 0.17% | 5 | | Aug 2026 | Oura | 3.5M | 80.8% | 1 | | Aug 2026 | RingConn | 346K | 8% | 2 | | Aug 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Ring | 288K | 6.6% | 3 | | Aug 2026 | Ultrahuman | 190K | 4.4% | 4 | | Aug 2026 | Circular | 8.8K | 0.2% | 5 | | Sep 2026 | Circular | — | — | — | | Sep 2026 | Oura | — | — | — | | Sep 2026 | RingConn | — | — | — | | Sep 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Ring | — | — | — | | Sep 2026 | Ultrahuman | — | — | — | ## What is being compared - **Circular**: Measured on the search terms “circular ring”, “circular smart ring” and “circular xyz”, summed into one figure. - **Oura**: Measured on the search terms “oura”, “oura ring”, “oura ring 4”, “oura ring com”, “oura ring gen 3”, “oura ring heritage”, “oura ring horizon”, “oura smart ring”, “ouraring com” and “smart ring oura”, summed into one figure. - **RingConn**: Measured on the search terms “ring conn”, “ringconn”, “ringconn com”, “ringconn gen 2”, “ringconn ring” and “ringconn smart ring”, summed into one figure. - **Samsung Galaxy Ring**: Measured on the search terms “galaxy ring”, “samsung galaxy ring”, “samsung ring” and “samsung smart ring”, summed into one figure. - **Ultrahuman**: Measured on the search terms “ultrahuman”, “ultrahuman com”, “ultrahuman ring” and “ultrahuman ring air”, summed into one figure. - [Circular](/demand/global-en/brands/circular) - [Oura](/demand/global-en/brands/oura) - [RingConn](/demand/global-en/brands/ringconn) - [Samsung Galaxy Ring](/demand/global-en/brands/samsung-galaxy-ring) - [Ultrahuman](/demand/global-en/brands/ultrahuman) ## Methodology - [How is branded search demand measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Which brand is most popular in search among smart ring brands worldwide? In August 2026, Oura was the most searched among smart ring brands worldwide, with an estimated 3.5M branded searches and 80.8% estimated Share of Search within this set. Worldwide · English terms: these are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Smart ring brands: Which brands are most popular in search?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/smart-ring-brands This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/smart-ring-brands. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.