--- title: "Philips vs RadiAnt DICOM Viewer: Which is searched more?" description: "Is Philips or RadiAnt DICOM Viewer more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Radiology software set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/radiology-software/compare/philips-vs-radiant-dicom" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Philips vs RadiAnt DICOM Viewer: Which is searched more? Is Philips or RadiAnt DICOM Viewer more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Radiology software set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: Philips and RadiAnt DICOM Viewer - **Competitive set**: Radiology software - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **Philips Share of Search**: 11.8% - **RadiAnt DICOM Viewer Share of Search**: 2.2% ## Is Philips or RadiAnt DICOM Viewer more popular in search? - In September 2026, Philips had more branded searches than RadiAnt DICOM Viewer among radiology software worldwide. Philips had about 135,000 branded searches, while RadiAnt DICOM Viewer had 25,100. Philips made up 11.8% of all radiology software searches we track, and RadiAnt DICOM Viewer accounted for 2.2%. - Philips was ahead of RadiAnt DICOM Viewer in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Philips’ share of searches among radiology software worldwide moved from 19.7% to 11.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 246K to 135K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, RadiAnt DICOM Viewer’s share of searches among radiology software worldwide moved from 1.8% to 2.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 22.5K to 25.1K. ## Top radiology software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Philips and RadiAnt DICOM Viewer were each mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Philips was listed before RadiAnt DICOM Viewer in two out of three answers. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Sectra | 1st | 3 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | Intelerad | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | Philips | 3rd | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | RadiAnt DICOM Viewer | 3rd | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Agfa HealthCare | 5th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 | | Fujifilm | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Siemens Healthineers | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about radiology software - Asked ChatGPT "Which radiology software should I use?": 1. RadiAnt DICOM Viewer, 2. Sectra, 3. Intelerad - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best radiology software tools?": 1. Sectra, 2. Intelerad, 3. Philips, 4. RadiAnt DICOM Viewer - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best radiology software for a radiology department?": 1. Sectra, 2. Philips, 3. Agfa HealthCare, 4. Intelerad - Searched Google, AI Overview "radiology information system": named none of the brands we track - Searched Google, AI Overview "medical imaging software": named none of the brands we track Not named in any answer: Fujifilm and Siemens Healthineers. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for radiology software worldwide in September 2026? - Estimated monthly branded searches for RadiAnt DICOM Viewer worldwide rose 11.6% over 12 measured months, from 22.5K to 25.1K in September 2026. - Estimated monthly branded searches for Philips worldwide fell 45.1% over 12 measured months, from 246K to 135K in September 2026. ## Month by month | Month | Philips estimated searches | Philips Share of Search | Philips rank | RadiAnt DICOM Viewer estimated searches | RadiAnt DICOM Viewer Share of Search | RadiAnt DICOM Viewer rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 246K | 19.7% | 2 | 22.5K | 1.8% | 4 | | Nov 2025 | 301K | 21.9% | 2 | 21.7K | 1.6% | 4 | | Dec 2025 | 301K | 20.7% | 2 | 21.7K | 1.5% | 4 | | Jan 2026 | 246K | 17.2% | 2 | 30.7K | 2.1% | 4 | | Feb 2026 | 201K | 18.5% | 2 | 25.8K | 2.4% | 4 | | Mar 2026 | 165K | 13.7% | 2 | 30.7K | 2.5% | 4 | | Apr 2026 | 165K | 14% | 2 | 30.7K | 2.6% | 4 | | May 2026 | 135K | 11.9% | 2 | 25.8K | 2.3% | 4 | | Jun 2026 | 135K | 13.7% | 2 | 21K | 2.1% | 4 | | Jul 2026 | 110K | 9.9% | 3 | 25.1K | 2.3% | 4 | | Aug 2026 | 135K | 11.8% | 2 | 30.7K | 2.7% | 4 | | Sep 2026 | 135K | 11.8% | 2 | 25.1K | 2.2% | 4 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Philips’ and RadiAnt DICOM Viewer’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **Philips**: Measured on the search term “philips airfryer”. - **RadiAnt DICOM Viewer**: Measured on the search terms “radiant dicom viewer” and “radiant viewer”, summed into one figure. - [Philips profile](/demand/global-en/brands/philips) - [RadiAnt DICOM Viewer profile](/demand/global-en/brands/radiant-dicom) - [All radiology software worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/radiology-software): The set both shares are measured inside, 7 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is Philips or RadiAnt DICOM Viewer more popular in search? In September 2026, Philips had more branded searches than RadiAnt DICOM Viewer among radiology software worldwide. Philips had about 135,000 branded searches, while RadiAnt DICOM Viewer had 25,100. Philips made up 11.8% of all radiology software searches we track, and RadiAnt DICOM Viewer accounted for 2.2%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Philips vs RadiAnt DICOM Viewer: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/radiology-software/compare/philips-vs-radiant-dicom This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/radiology-software/compare/philips-vs-radiant-dicom. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.