---
title: "Cuisinart vs Pyrex: Which is searched more?"
description: "Is Cuisinart or Pyrex more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Mixing bowls brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time."
canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/mixing-bowls-brands/compare/cuisinart-vs-pyrex"
publisher: "Brandwave"
---

# Cuisinart vs Pyrex: Which is searched more?

Is Cuisinart or Pyrex more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Mixing bowls brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.

## Key facts

- **Compared**: Cuisinart and Pyrex
- **Competitive set**: Mixing bowls brands
- **Market**: Global
- **Month measured**: Sep 2026
- **Cuisinart Share of Search**: 28.6%
- **Pyrex Share of Search**: 23.8%

## Is Cuisinart or Pyrex more popular in search?

- In September 2026, Cuisinart had more branded searches than Pyrex among mixing bowls brands worldwide. Cuisinart had about 198,000 branded searches, while Pyrex had 165,000. Cuisinart made up 28.6% of all mixing bowls brand searches we track, and Pyrex accounted for 23.8%.
- Cuisinart was ahead of Pyrex in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Cuisinart’s share of searches among mixing bowls brands worldwide moved from 29.8% to 28.6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 242K to 198K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Pyrex’s share of searches among mixing bowls brands worldwide moved from 20.3% to 23.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 165K.

## Top mixing bowls brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and one Google AI Overview, Pyrex appeared in all four answers. Cuisinart was mentioned in three out of four: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in the Google AI Overview. Cuisinart was listed before Pyrex in two out of three answers.

Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options.

| Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| OXO | 1st | 3 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 3 of 4 |
| Cuisinart | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 3 of 4 |
| Pyrex | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 1 | 4 of 4 |
| All-Clad | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 |
| Joseph Joseph | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 |

## Every AI answer about mixing bowls brands

- Asked ChatGPT "Which mixing bowls brand should I buy?": 1. OXO, 2. Cuisinart, 3. Pyrex
- Asked ChatGPT "What are the best mixing bowls brands?": 1. OXO, 2. Cuisinart, 3. Pyrex
- Asked ChatGPT "What's the best mixing bowls brand for everyday baking?": 1. OXO, 2. Pyrex, 3. Cuisinart
- Searched Google, AI Overview "mixing bowl set": 1. Pyrex

Not named in any answer: All-Clad and Joseph Joseph.

Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026.

## How did search popularity change for mixing bowls brands worldwide in September 2026?

- In September 2026, Cuisinart lost share of searches among mixing bowls brands worldwide, from 30.3% to 28.6%.
- In September 2026, Pyrex lost share of searches among mixing bowls brands worldwide, from 25.2% to 23.8%.

## Month by month

| Month | Cuisinart estimated searches | Cuisinart Share of Search | Cuisinart rank | Pyrex estimated searches | Pyrex Share of Search | Pyrex rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oct 2025 | 242K | 29.8% | 1 | 165K | 20.3% | 2 |
| Nov 2025 | 411K | 34.6% | 1 | 201K | 16.9% | 3 |
| Dec 2025 | 411K | 35.5% | 1 | 201K | 17.4% | 3 |
| Jan 2026 | 337K | 33.6% | 1 | 201K | 20% | 2 |
| Feb 2026 | 215K | 28.2% | 1 | 165K | 21.7% | 2 |
| Mar 2026 | 275K | 34.6% | 1 | 165K | 20.8% | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | 198K | 27.6% | 1 | 165K | 23% | 2 |
| May 2026 | 234K | 32.1% | 1 | 165K | 22.6% | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | 198K | 23.9% | 2 | 165K | 19.9% | 3 |
| Jul 2026 | 234K | 32.1% | 1 | 165K | 22.6% | 2 |
| Aug 2026 | 242K | 30.3% | 1 | 201K | 25.2% | 2 |
| Sep 2026 | 198K | 28.6% | 1 | 165K | 23.8% | 2 |

## How each brand is measured

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Cuisinart’s and Pyrex’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

- **Cuisinart**: Measured on the search terms “cuisinart” and “cuisinart food processor”, summed into one figure.
- **Pyrex**: Measured on the search term “pyrex”.

- [Cuisinart profile](/demand/global-en/brands/cuisinart)
- [Pyrex profile](/demand/global-en/brands/pyrex)
- [All mixing bowls brands worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/mixing-bowls-brands): The set both shares are measured inside, 5 brands.

## Methodology

- [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused.

## Frequently asked questions

### Is Cuisinart or Pyrex more popular in search?

In September 2026, Cuisinart had more branded searches than Pyrex among mixing bowls brands worldwide. Cuisinart had about 198,000 branded searches, while Pyrex had 165,000. Cuisinart made up 28.6% of all mixing bowls brand searches we track, and Pyrex accounted for 23.8%.

## Cite this page

Brandwave. "Cuisinart vs Pyrex: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/mixing-bowls-brands/compare/cuisinart-vs-pyrex

This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/mixing-bowls-brands/compare/cuisinart-vs-pyrex. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.
