--- title: "Ryobi vs Toro: Which is searched more?" description: "Is Ryobi or Toro more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Leaf vacuum brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/leaf-vacuum-brands/compare/ryobi-vs-toro" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Ryobi vs Toro: Which is searched more? Is Ryobi or Toro more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Leaf vacuum brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: Ryobi and Toro - **Competitive set**: Leaf vacuum brands - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **Ryobi Share of Search**: 42.5% - **Toro Share of Search**: 6.7% ## Is Ryobi or Toro more popular in search? - In September 2026, Ryobi had more branded searches than Toro among leaf vacuum brands worldwide. Ryobi had about 10,200 branded searches, while Toro had 1,600. Ryobi made up 42.5% of all leaf vacuum brand searches we track, and Toro accounted for 6.7%. - Ryobi was ahead of Toro in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Ryobi’s share of searches among leaf vacuum brands worldwide moved from 35.3% to 42.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 13.5K to 10.2K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Toro’s share of searches among leaf vacuum brands worldwide moved from 7.6% to 6.7%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 2.9K to 1.6K. ## Top leaf vacuum brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Toro was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Ryobi was mentioned in one out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Toro was listed before Ryobi in four out of five answers. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Toro | 1st | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | WORX | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | Stihl | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | Black+Decker | 4th | 1 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | Ryobi | 5th | 0 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 1 of 5 | | Greenworks | 6th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 | | Milwaukee | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about leaf vacuum brands - Asked ChatGPT "Which leaf vacuum brand should I buy?": 1. Toro, 2. WORX, 3. Stihl - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best leaf vacuum brands?": 1. Stihl, 2. Toro, 3. WORX, 4. Black+Decker, 5. Greenworks - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best leaf vacuum brand for fallen leaves?": 1. Toro, 2. WORX, 3. Stihl - Searched Google, AI Overview "best leaf vacuum": 1. Toro, 2. WORX, 3. Black+Decker - Searched Google, AI Overview "cordless leaf vacuum": 1. Ryobi, 2. Black+Decker Not named in any answer: Milwaukee. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for leaf vacuum brands worldwide in September 2026? - In September 2026, Toro overtook WORX to rank 5th among leaf vacuum brands worldwide, with 6.7% of the searches. - In September 2026, Ryobi gained share of searches among leaf vacuum brands worldwide, from 41.8% to 42.5%. ## Month by month | Month | Ryobi estimated searches | Ryobi Share of Search | Ryobi rank | Toro estimated searches | Toro Share of Search | Toro rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 13.5K | 35.3% | 1 | 2.9K | 7.6% | 6 | | Nov 2025 | 22.5K | 35.7% | 1 | 6.6K | 10.5% | 4 | | Dec 2025 | 12.5K | 44.2% | 1 | 1.6K | 5.7% | 6 | | Jan 2026 | 8K | 42.7% | 1 | 880 | 4.7% | 7 | | Feb 2026 | 5.8K | 36% | 1 | 720 | 4.5% | 7 | | Mar 2026 | 15K | 48.6% | 1 | 1.9K | 6.2% | 6 | | Apr 2026 | 8.3K | 35.3% | 1 | 1.6K | 6.8% | 6 | | May 2026 | 8.3K | 37.2% | 1 | 1.6K | 7.2% | 6 | | Jun 2026 | 6K | 37.3% | 1 | 880 | 5.5% | 7 | | Jul 2026 | 6K | 39% | 1 | 880 | 5.7% | 6 | | Aug 2026 | 7.8K | 41.8% | 1 | 1K | 5.4% | 6 | | Sep 2026 | 10.2K | 42.5% | 1 | 1.6K | 6.7% | 5 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Ryobi’s and Toro’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **Ryobi**: Measured on the search terms “ryobi blower vac” and “ryobi leaf vacuum”, summed into one figure. - **Toro**: Measured on the search term “toro leaf vacuum”. - [Ryobi profile](/demand/global-en/brands/ryobi) - [Toro profile](/demand/global-en/brands/toro) - [All leaf vacuum brands worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/leaf-vacuum-brands): The set both shares are measured inside, 7 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is Ryobi or Toro more popular in search? In September 2026, Ryobi had more branded searches than Toro among leaf vacuum brands worldwide. Ryobi had about 10,200 branded searches, while Toro had 1,600. Ryobi made up 42.5% of all leaf vacuum brand searches we track, and Toro accounted for 6.7%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Ryobi vs Toro: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/leaf-vacuum-brands/compare/ryobi-vs-toro This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/leaf-vacuum-brands/compare/ryobi-vs-toro. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.