---
title: "Graph databases: Which brands are most popular in search?"
description: "Compare the databases built for connected data. Share of Search among Neo4j, Memgraph, ArangoDB, Amazon Neptune and TigerGraph, the graph databases Brandwave compares worldwide, using the same methodology, market, and reporting period. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time."
canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/graph-databases"
publisher: "Brandwave"
---

# Graph databases: Which brands are most popular in search?

Compare the databases built for connected data. Share of Search among Neo4j, Memgraph, ArangoDB, Amazon Neptune and TigerGraph, the graph databases Brandwave compares worldwide, using the same methodology, market, and reporting period. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.

## Key facts

- **Competitive set**: Graph databases
- **Market**: Global
- **Brands compared**: 5
- **Month measured**: Aug 2026
- **Highest Share of Search**: Neo4j, 84.7%

## Which brand is most popular in search among graph databases worldwide?

- In August 2026, Neo4j was the most searched among graph databases worldwide, with an estimated 90.5K branded searches and 84.7% estimated Share of Search within this set.
- Memgraph is in 2nd place, 79.7 percentage points behind at 5.1% Share of Search.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Neo4j’s estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide increased from 82.5% to 84.7%.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Memgraph’s estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide increased from 4.1% to 5.1%.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, ArangoDB’s estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide decreased from 6.1% to 4.1%.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Amazon Neptune’s estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide decreased from 4.1% to 3.4%.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, TigerGraph’s estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide decreased from 3.3% to 2.7%.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Neo4j’s estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide peaked at 85.9% in June 2026 and was lowest at 80.1% in January 2026.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Memgraph’s estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide peaked at 5.1% in August 2026 and was lowest at 4% in December 2025.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, ArangoDB’s estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide peaked at 7.4% in November 2025 and was lowest at 4.1% in August 2026.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Amazon Neptune’s estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide peaked at 4.8% in January 2026 and was lowest at 2.8% in March 2026.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, TigerGraph’s estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide peaked at 3.3% in October 2025 and was lowest at 2.3% in June 2026.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Memgraph rose from 4th to 2nd among graph databases worldwide.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, ArangoDB fell from 2nd to 3rd among graph databases worldwide.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Amazon Neptune fell from 3rd to 4th among graph databases worldwide.

## Compare search popularity between leading brands

- [Neo4j vs Memgraph: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/memgraph-vs-neo4j): 84.7% against 5.1% Share of Search.
- [Neo4j vs ArangoDB: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/arangodb-vs-neo4j): 84.7% against 4.1% Share of Search.
- [Neo4j vs Amazon Neptune: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/amazon-neptune-vs-neo4j): 84.7% against 3.4% Share of Search.
- [Neo4j vs TigerGraph: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/neo4j-vs-tigergraph): 84.7% against 2.7% Share of Search.
- [Memgraph vs ArangoDB: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/arangodb-vs-memgraph): 5.1% against 4.1% Share of Search.
- [Memgraph vs Amazon Neptune: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/amazon-neptune-vs-memgraph): 5.1% against 3.4% Share of Search.
- [Memgraph vs TigerGraph: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/memgraph-vs-tigergraph): 5.1% against 2.7% Share of Search.
- [ArangoDB vs Amazon Neptune: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/amazon-neptune-vs-arangodb): 4.1% against 3.4% Share of Search.
- [ArangoDB vs TigerGraph: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/arangodb-vs-tigergraph): 4.1% against 2.7% Share of Search.
- [Amazon Neptune vs TigerGraph: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/amazon-neptune-vs-tigergraph): 3.4% against 2.7% Share of Search.

## How did search popularity change for graph databases worldwide in August 2026?

- In August 2026, Neo4j gained estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide, from 83.3% to 84.7%.
- In August 2026, ArangoDB lost estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide, from 5% to 4.1%.
- In August 2026, Amazon Neptune lost estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide, from 4.1% to 3.4%.
- Memgraph’s estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide has gained ground for 3 months in a row, from 4.2% to 5.1% in August 2026.
- Estimated monthly branded searches for TigerGraph worldwide fell 34.1% over 11 measured months, from 4.4K to 2.9K in August 2026.

## Share of Search ranking

| Rank | Brand | Share of Search | Estimated monthly branded searches | Change vs prior month | Owned by |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Neo4j | 84.7% | 90.5K | 0.0% | Neo4j |
| 2 | Memgraph | 5.1% | 5.4K | 0.0% | Memgraph |
| 3 | ArangoDB | 4.1% | 4.4K | -18.5% | ArangoDB |
| 4 | Amazon Neptune | 3.4% | 3.6K | -18.2% | Amazon Neptune |
| 5 | TigerGraph | 2.7% | 2.9K | 0.0% | TigerGraph |

## Historical estimated branded-search demand

| Month | Brand | Estimated monthly branded searches | Share of Search | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oct 2025 | Neo4j | 110K | 82.5% | 1 |
| Oct 2025 | ArangoDB | 8.1K | 6.1% | 2 |
| Oct 2025 | Amazon Neptune | 5.4K | 4.1% | 3 |
| Oct 2025 | Memgraph | 5.4K | 4.1% | 4 |
| Oct 2025 | TigerGraph | 4.4K | 3.3% | 5 |
| Nov 2025 | Neo4j | 110K | 81.9% | 1 |
| Nov 2025 | ArangoDB | 9.9K | 7.4% | 2 |
| Nov 2025 | Amazon Neptune | 5.4K | 4% | 3 |
| Nov 2025 | Memgraph | 5.4K | 4% | 4 |
| Nov 2025 | TigerGraph | 3.6K | 2.7% | 5 |
| Dec 2025 | Neo4j | 90.5K | 82% | 1 |
| Dec 2025 | ArangoDB | 8.1K | 7.3% | 2 |
| Dec 2025 | Amazon Neptune | 4.4K | 4% | 3 |
| Dec 2025 | Memgraph | 4.4K | 4% | 4 |
| Dec 2025 | TigerGraph | 2.9K | 2.6% | 5 |
| Jan 2026 | Neo4j | 90.5K | 80.1% | 1 |
| Jan 2026 | ArangoDB | 8.1K | 7.2% | 2 |
| Jan 2026 | Amazon Neptune | 5.4K | 4.8% | 3 |
| Jan 2026 | Memgraph | 5.4K | 4.8% | 4 |
| Jan 2026 | TigerGraph | 3.6K | 3.2% | 5 |
| Feb 2026 | Neo4j | 90.5K | 81.9% | 1 |
| Feb 2026 | ArangoDB | 6.6K | 6% | 2 |
| Feb 2026 | Memgraph | 5.4K | 4.9% | 3 |
| Feb 2026 | Amazon Neptune | 4.4K | 4% | 4 |
| Feb 2026 | TigerGraph | 3.6K | 3.3% | 5 |
| Mar 2026 | Neo4j | 135K | 85.2% | 1 |
| Mar 2026 | ArangoDB | 8.1K | 5.1% | 2 |
| Mar 2026 | Memgraph | 6.6K | 4.2% | 3 |
| Mar 2026 | Amazon Neptune | 4.4K | 2.8% | 4 |
| Mar 2026 | TigerGraph | 4.4K | 2.8% | 5 |
| Apr 2026 | Neo4j | 110K | 83.8% | 1 |
| Apr 2026 | ArangoDB | 6.6K | 5% | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | Memgraph | 6.6K | 5% | 3 |
| Apr 2026 | Amazon Neptune | 4.4K | 3.4% | 4 |
| Apr 2026 | TigerGraph | 3.6K | 2.7% | 5 |
| May 2026 | Neo4j | 110K | 84.6% | 1 |
| May 2026 | ArangoDB | 6.6K | 5.1% | 2 |
| May 2026 | Memgraph | 5.4K | 4.2% | 3 |
| May 2026 | Amazon Neptune | 4.4K | 3.4% | 4 |
| May 2026 | TigerGraph | 3.6K | 2.8% | 5 |
| Jun 2026 | Neo4j | 110K | 85.9% | 1 |
| Jun 2026 | ArangoDB | 5.4K | 4.2% | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | Memgraph | 5.4K | 4.2% | 3 |
| Jun 2026 | Amazon Neptune | 4.4K | 3.4% | 4 |
| Jun 2026 | TigerGraph | 2.9K | 2.3% | 5 |
| Jul 2026 | Neo4j | 90.5K | 83.3% | 1 |
| Jul 2026 | ArangoDB | 5.4K | 5% | 2 |
| Jul 2026 | Memgraph | 5.4K | 5% | 3 |
| Jul 2026 | Amazon Neptune | 4.4K | 4.1% | 4 |
| Jul 2026 | TigerGraph | 2.9K | 2.7% | 5 |
| Aug 2026 | Neo4j | 90.5K | 84.7% | 1 |
| Aug 2026 | Memgraph | 5.4K | 5.1% | 2 |
| Aug 2026 | ArangoDB | 4.4K | 4.1% | 3 |
| Aug 2026 | Amazon Neptune | 3.6K | 3.4% | 4 |
| Aug 2026 | TigerGraph | 2.9K | 2.7% | 5 |
| Sep 2026 | Amazon Neptune | — | — | — |
| Sep 2026 | ArangoDB | — | — | — |
| Sep 2026 | Memgraph | — | — | — |
| Sep 2026 | Neo4j | — | — | — |
| Sep 2026 | TigerGraph | — | — | — |

## What is being compared

- **Amazon Neptune**: Measured on the search term “amazon neptune”.
- **ArangoDB**: Measured on the search term “arangodb”.
- **Memgraph**: Measured on the search term “memgraph”.
- **Neo4j**: Measured on the search term “neo4j”.
- **TigerGraph**: Measured on the search term “tigergraph”.

- [Amazon Neptune](/demand/global-en/brands/amazon-neptune)
- [ArangoDB](/demand/global-en/brands/arangodb)
- [Memgraph](/demand/global-en/brands/memgraph)
- [Neo4j](/demand/global-en/brands/neo4j)
- [TigerGraph](/demand/global-en/brands/tigergraph)

## Methodology

- [How is branded search demand measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which brand is most popular in search among graph databases worldwide?

In August 2026, Neo4j was the most searched among graph databases worldwide, with an estimated 90.5K branded searches and 84.7% estimated Share of Search within this set. These are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms.

## Cite this page

Brandwave. "Graph databases: Which brands are most popular in search?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/graph-databases

This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/graph-databases. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.
