---
title: "Cordless vacuum brands: Which are searched most?"
description: "Compare the cordless vacuum brands brands people buy. Share of Search among Dyson, Electrolux, Ryobi, LG, BISSELL, Hoover, Samsung and Miele, the cordless vacuum brands Brandwave compares worldwide, using the same methodology, market, and reporting period. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time."
canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/cordless-vacuum-brands"
publisher: "Brandwave"
---

# Cordless vacuum brands: Which are searched most?

Compare the cordless vacuum brands brands people buy. Share of Search among Dyson, Electrolux, Ryobi, LG, BISSELL, Hoover, Samsung and Miele, the cordless vacuum brands Brandwave compares worldwide, using the same methodology, market, and reporting period. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.

## Key facts

- **Competitive set**: Cordless vacuum brands
- **Market**: Global
- **Brands compared**: 8
- **Month measured**: Sep 2026
- **Highest Share of Search**: Dyson, 59%

## Which brand is most popular in search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide?

- In September 2026, Dyson was the most searched among cordless vacuum brands worldwide, with an estimated 5M branded searches and 59% estimated Share of Search within this set.
- Electrolux is in 2nd place, 41.3 percentage points behind at 17.7% Share of Search.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, LG’s estimated Share of Search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide decreased from 5.5% to 4.6%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Dyson’s estimated Share of Search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide peaked at 62.8% in December 2025 and was lowest at 51.6% in March 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Electrolux’s estimated Share of Search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide peaked at 19.7% in June 2026 and was lowest at 15.4% in December 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Ryobi’s estimated Share of Search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide peaked at 11.5% in June 2026 and was lowest at 7.5% in October 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, LG’s estimated Share of Search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide peaked at 7.2% in March 2026 and was lowest at 3.2% in November 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, BISSELL’s estimated Share of Search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide peaked at 4.7% in August 2026 and was lowest at 3.1% in December 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Hoover’s estimated Share of Search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide peaked at 4.3% in January 2026 and was lowest at 3% in November 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Samsung’s estimated Share of Search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide peaked at 2.7% in July 2026 and was lowest at 1.5% in November 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Dyson, Electrolux, Ryobi, BISSELL, Hoover, Samsung and Miele held steady: their estimated Share of Search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide each moved less than 0.5 percentage points.

## Compare search popularity between leading brands

- [Dyson vs Electrolux: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/dyson-vs-electrolux): 59% against 17.7% Share of Search.
- [Dyson vs Ryobi: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/dyson-vs-ryobi): 59% against 7.8% Share of Search.
- [Dyson vs LG: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/dyson-vs-lg): 59% against 4.6% Share of Search.
- [Dyson vs BISSELL: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/bissell-vs-dyson): 59% against 4.3% Share of Search.
- [Electrolux vs Ryobi: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/electrolux-vs-ryobi): 17.7% against 7.8% Share of Search.
- [Electrolux vs LG: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/electrolux-vs-lg): 17.7% against 4.6% Share of Search.
- [Electrolux vs BISSELL: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/bissell-vs-electrolux): 17.7% against 4.3% Share of Search.
- [Ryobi vs LG: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/lg-vs-ryobi): 7.8% against 4.6% Share of Search.
- [Ryobi vs BISSELL: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/bissell-vs-ryobi): 7.8% against 4.3% Share of Search.
- [LG vs BISSELL: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/bissell-vs-lg): 4.6% against 4.3% Share of Search.

## How did search popularity change for cordless vacuum brands worldwide in September 2026?

- In September 2026, Dyson gained estimated Share of Search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide, from 52.7% to 59%.
- In September 2026, Electrolux lost estimated Share of Search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide, from 19.3% to 17.7%.
- In September 2026, LG lost estimated Share of Search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide, from 6.1% to 4.6%.
- In September 2026, Ryobi lost estimated Share of Search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide, from 9.2% to 7.8%.

## Share of Search ranking

| Rank | Brand | Share of Search | Estimated monthly branded searches | Change vs prior month | Owned by |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Dyson | 59% | 5M | +22.2% | Dyson |
| 2 | Electrolux | 17.7% | 1.5M | 0.0% | Electrolux Group |
| 3 | Ryobi | 7.8% | 660K | -7.7% | Ryobi |
| 4 | LG | 4.6% | 386K | -18.2% | LG |
| 5 | BISSELL | 4.3% | 368K | 0.0% | BISSELL |
| 6 | Hoover | 3.6% | 301K | 0.0% | Hoover |
| 7 | Samsung | 1.8% | 151K | -14.2% | Samsung |
| 8 | Miele | 1.3% | 111K | -18.4% | Miele |

## Historical estimated branded-search demand

| Month | Brand | Estimated monthly branded searches | Share of Search | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oct 2025 | Dyson | 5M | 58.5% | 1 |
| Oct 2025 | Electrolux | 1.5M | 17.6% | 2 |
| Oct 2025 | Ryobi | 641K | 7.5% | 3 |
| Oct 2025 | LG | 472K | 5.5% | 4 |
| Oct 2025 | BISSELL | 368K | 4.3% | 5 |
| Oct 2025 | Hoover | 301K | 3.5% | 6 |
| Oct 2025 | Samsung | 151K | 1.8% | 7 |
| Oct 2025 | Miele | 111K | 1.3% | 8 |
| Nov 2025 | Dyson | 7.5M | 61.3% | 1 |
| Nov 2025 | Electrolux | 2.2M | 18.4% | 2 |
| Nov 2025 | Ryobi | 919K | 7.5% | 3 |
| Nov 2025 | BISSELL | 450K | 3.7% | 4 |
| Nov 2025 | LG | 395K | 3.2% | 5 |
| Nov 2025 | Hoover | 368K | 3% | 6 |
| Nov 2025 | Samsung | 185K | 1.5% | 7 |
| Nov 2025 | Miele | 166K | 1.4% | 8 |
| Dec 2025 | Dyson | 6.1M | 62.8% | 1 |
| Dec 2025 | Electrolux | 1.5M | 15.4% | 2 |
| Dec 2025 | Ryobi | 751K | 7.7% | 3 |
| Dec 2025 | LG | 390K | 4% | 4 |
| Dec 2025 | Hoover | 368K | 3.8% | 5 |
| Dec 2025 | BISSELL | 301K | 3.1% | 6 |
| Dec 2025 | Miele | 166K | 1.7% | 7 |
| Dec 2025 | Samsung | 151K | 1.5% | 8 |
| Jan 2026 | Dyson | 5M | 58.1% | 1 |
| Jan 2026 | Electrolux | 1.5M | 17.4% | 2 |
| Jan 2026 | Ryobi | 685K | 8% | 3 |
| Jan 2026 | LG | 472K | 5.5% | 4 |
| Jan 2026 | Hoover | 368K | 4.3% | 5 |
| Jan 2026 | BISSELL | 301K | 3.5% | 6 |
| Jan 2026 | Samsung | 151K | 1.7% | 7 |
| Jan 2026 | Miele | 136K | 1.6% | 8 |
| Feb 2026 | Dyson | 4.1M | 56.6% | 1 |
| Feb 2026 | Electrolux | 1.2M | 16.9% | 2 |
| Feb 2026 | Ryobi | 560K | 7.7% | 3 |
| Feb 2026 | LG | 472K | 6.5% | 4 |
| Feb 2026 | BISSELL | 301K | 4.2% | 5 |
| Feb 2026 | Hoover | 301K | 4.2% | 6 |
| Feb 2026 | Samsung | 176K | 2.4% | 7 |
| Feb 2026 | Miele | 111K | 1.5% | 8 |
| Mar 2026 | Dyson | 4.1M | 51.6% | 1 |
| Mar 2026 | Electrolux | 1.5M | 18.9% | 2 |
| Mar 2026 | Ryobi | 783K | 9.9% | 3 |
| Mar 2026 | LG | 572K | 7.2% | 4 |
| Mar 2026 | BISSELL | 368K | 4.6% | 5 |
| Mar 2026 | Hoover | 301K | 3.8% | 6 |
| Mar 2026 | Samsung | 176K | 2.2% | 7 |
| Mar 2026 | Miele | 136K | 1.7% | 8 |
| Apr 2026 | Dyson | 4.1M | 53.6% | 1 |
| Apr 2026 | Electrolux | 1.5M | 19.7% | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | Ryobi | 783K | 10.3% | 3 |
| Apr 2026 | LG | 390K | 5.1% | 4 |
| Apr 2026 | BISSELL | 301K | 3.9% | 5 |
| Apr 2026 | Hoover | 301K | 3.9% | 6 |
| Apr 2026 | Samsung | 151K | 2% | 7 |
| Apr 2026 | Miele | 111K | 1.5% | 8 |
| May 2026 | Dyson | 4.1M | 53.6% | 1 |
| May 2026 | Electrolux | 1.5M | 19.7% | 2 |
| May 2026 | Ryobi | 838K | 11% | 3 |
| May 2026 | LG | 390K | 5.1% | 4 |
| May 2026 | Hoover | 301K | 3.9% | 5 |
| May 2026 | BISSELL | 246K | 3.2% | 6 |
| May 2026 | Samsung | 151K | 2% | 7 |
| May 2026 | Miele | 111K | 1.5% | 8 |
| Jun 2026 | Dyson | 4.1M | 53.8% | 1 |
| Jun 2026 | Electrolux | 1.5M | 19.7% | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | Ryobi | 874K | 11.5% | 3 |
| Jun 2026 | LG | 390K | 5.1% | 4 |
| Jun 2026 | BISSELL | 246K | 3.2% | 5 |
| Jun 2026 | Hoover | 246K | 3.2% | 6 |
| Jun 2026 | Samsung | 151K | 2% | 7 |
| Jun 2026 | Miele | 111K | 1.5% | 8 |
| Jul 2026 | Dyson | 3.4M | 51.9% | 1 |
| Jul 2026 | Electrolux | 1.2M | 18.9% | 2 |
| Jul 2026 | Ryobi | 715K | 11.1% | 3 |
| Jul 2026 | LG | 390K | 6% | 4 |
| Jul 2026 | BISSELL | 246K | 3.8% | 5 |
| Jul 2026 | Hoover | 246K | 3.8% | 6 |
| Jul 2026 | Samsung | 176K | 2.7% | 7 |
| Jul 2026 | Miele | 111K | 1.7% | 8 |
| Aug 2026 | Dyson | 4.1M | 52.7% | 1 |
| Aug 2026 | Electrolux | 1.5M | 19.3% | 2 |
| Aug 2026 | Ryobi | 715K | 9.2% | 3 |
| Aug 2026 | LG | 472K | 6.1% | 4 |
| Aug 2026 | BISSELL | 368K | 4.7% | 5 |
| Aug 2026 | Hoover | 301K | 3.9% | 6 |
| Aug 2026 | Samsung | 176K | 2.3% | 7 |
| Aug 2026 | Miele | 136K | 1.8% | 8 |
| Sep 2026 | Dyson | 5M | 59% | 1 |
| Sep 2026 | Electrolux | 1.5M | 17.7% | 2 |
| Sep 2026 | Ryobi | 660K | 7.8% | 3 |
| Sep 2026 | LG | 386K | 4.6% | 4 |
| Sep 2026 | BISSELL | 368K | 4.3% | 5 |
| Sep 2026 | Hoover | 301K | 3.6% | 6 |
| Sep 2026 | Samsung | 151K | 1.8% | 7 |
| Sep 2026 | Miele | 111K | 1.3% | 8 |

## What is being compared

- **BISSELL**: Measured on the search term “bissell”.
- **Dyson**: Measured on the search term “dyson”.
- **Electrolux**: Measured on the search term “electrolux”.
- **Hoover**: Measured on the search term “hoover”.
- **LG**: Measured on the search terms “lg com” and “lg washing machine”, summed into one figure.
- **Miele**: Measured on the search terms “miele com” and “miele vacuum”, summed into one figure.
- **Ryobi**: Measured on the search terms “ryobi” and “ryobi tool”, summed into one figure.
- **Samsung**: Measured on the search terms “samsung com” and “samsung washer”, summed into one figure.

- [BISSELL](/demand/global-en/brands/bissell)
- [Dyson](/demand/global-en/brands/dyson)
- [Electrolux](/demand/global-en/brands/electrolux)
- [Hoover](/demand/global-en/brands/hoover)
- [LG](/demand/global-en/brands/lg)
- [Miele](/demand/global-en/brands/miele)
- [Ryobi](/demand/global-en/brands/ryobi)
- [Samsung](/demand/global-en/brands/samsung)

## Methodology

- [How is branded search demand measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which brand is most popular in search among cordless vacuum brands worldwide?

In September 2026, Dyson was the most searched among cordless vacuum brands worldwide, with an estimated 5M branded searches and 59% estimated Share of Search within this set. These are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms.

## Cite this page

Brandwave. "Cordless vacuum brands: Which are searched most?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/cordless-vacuum-brands

This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/cordless-vacuum-brands. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.