--- title: "AI presentation makers: Which brands are most popular in search?" description: "Compare the tools that build slide decks from a prompt. Share of Search among Gamma, Beautiful.ai, Tome and Decktopus, the AI presentation makers Brandwave compares worldwide, using the same methodology, market, and reporting period. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/ai-presentation-makers" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # AI presentation makers: Which brands are most popular in search? Compare the tools that build slide decks from a prompt. Share of Search among Gamma, Beautiful.ai, Tome and Decktopus, the AI presentation makers Brandwave compares worldwide, using the same methodology, market, and reporting period. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Competitive set**: AI presentation makers - **Market**: Global - **Brands compared**: 4 - **Month measured**: Aug 2026 - **Highest Share of Search**: Gamma, 82.8% ## Which brand is most popular in search among AI presentation makers worldwide? - In August 2026, Gamma was the most searched among AI presentation makers worldwide, with an estimated 550K branded searches and 82.8% estimated Share of Search within this set. - Beautiful.ai is in 2nd place, 67.7 percentage points behind at 15.1% Share of Search. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Gamma’s estimated Share of Search among AI presentation makers worldwide increased from 78.2% to 82.8%. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Beautiful.ai’s estimated Share of Search among AI presentation makers worldwide decreased from 17.3% to 15.1%. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Tome’s estimated Share of Search among AI presentation makers worldwide decreased from 3.2% to 1.5%. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Decktopus’ estimated Share of Search among AI presentation makers worldwide decreased from 1.4% to 0.66%. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Gamma’s estimated Share of Search among AI presentation makers worldwide peaked at 82.8% in August 2026 and was lowest at 75.5% in January 2026. - Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Beautiful.ai’s estimated Share of Search among AI presentation makers worldwide peaked at 20.3% in January 2026 and was lowest at 14.7% in November 2025. ## Compare search popularity between leading brands - [Gamma vs Beautiful.ai: compare search popularity](/demand/global-en/compare/beautiful-ai-vs-gamma): 82.8% against 15.1% Share of Search. ## How did search popularity change for AI presentation makers worldwide in August 2026? - In August 2026, Gamma gained estimated Share of Search among AI presentation makers worldwide, from 79.8% to 82.8%. - In August 2026, Beautiful.ai lost estimated Share of Search among AI presentation makers worldwide, from 17.8% to 15.1%. - Tome’s estimated Share of Search among AI presentation makers worldwide has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 2.2% to 1.5% in August 2026. - Estimated monthly branded searches for Decktopus worldwide fell 83.8% over 11 measured months, from 27.1K to 4.4K in August 2026. ## Share of Search ranking | Rank | Brand | Share of Search | Estimated monthly branded searches | Change vs prior month | Owned by | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | Gamma | 82.8% | 550K | 0.0% | Gamma | | 2 | Beautiful.ai | 15.1% | 100K | -18.2% | Beautiful.ai | | 3 | Tome | 1.5% | 9.9K | -18.2% | Tome | | 4 | Decktopus | 0.66% | 4.4K | 0.0% | Decktopus | ## Historical estimated branded-search demand | Month | Brand | Estimated monthly branded searches | Share of Search | Rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | Gamma | 1.5M | 78.2% | 1 | | Oct 2025 | Beautiful.ai | 332K | 17.3% | 2 | | Oct 2025 | Tome | 60.5K | 3.2% | 3 | | Oct 2025 | Decktopus | 27.1K | 1.4% | 4 | | Nov 2025 | Gamma | 1.5M | 81.4% | 1 | | Nov 2025 | Beautiful.ai | 271K | 14.7% | 2 | | Nov 2025 | Tome | 49.5K | 2.7% | 3 | | Nov 2025 | Decktopus | 22.2K | 1.2% | 4 | | Dec 2025 | Gamma | 1M | 78.6% | 1 | | Dec 2025 | Beautiful.ai | 221K | 17.4% | 2 | | Dec 2025 | Tome | 33.1K | 2.6% | 3 | | Dec 2025 | Decktopus | 18.1K | 1.4% | 4 | | Jan 2026 | Gamma | 823K | 75.5% | 1 | | Jan 2026 | Beautiful.ai | 222K | 20.3% | 2 | | Jan 2026 | Tome | 33.1K | 3% | 3 | | Jan 2026 | Decktopus | 12.1K | 1.1% | 4 | | Feb 2026 | Gamma | 1M | 78.9% | 1 | | Feb 2026 | Beautiful.ai | 222K | 17.5% | 2 | | Feb 2026 | Tome | 33.1K | 2.6% | 3 | | Feb 2026 | Decktopus | 12.1K | 0.95% | 4 | | Mar 2026 | Gamma | 1.2M | 82% | 1 | | Mar 2026 | Beautiful.ai | 222K | 14.9% | 2 | | Mar 2026 | Tome | 33.1K | 2.2% | 3 | | Mar 2026 | Decktopus | 12.1K | 0.81% | 4 | | Apr 2026 | Gamma | 1.2M | 82% | 1 | | Apr 2026 | Beautiful.ai | 222K | 14.9% | 2 | | Apr 2026 | Tome | 33.1K | 2.2% | 3 | | Apr 2026 | Decktopus | 12.1K | 0.81% | 4 | | May 2026 | Gamma | 1M | 82% | 1 | | May 2026 | Beautiful.ai | 183K | 15% | 2 | | May 2026 | Tome | 27.1K | 2.2% | 3 | | May 2026 | Decktopus | 9.9K | 0.81% | 4 | | Jun 2026 | Gamma | 823K | 79.6% | 1 | | Jun 2026 | Beautiful.ai | 182K | 17.6% | 2 | | Jun 2026 | Tome | 22.2K | 2.1% | 3 | | Jun 2026 | Decktopus | 6.6K | 0.64% | 4 | | Jul 2026 | Gamma | 550K | 79.8% | 1 | | Jul 2026 | Beautiful.ai | 122K | 17.8% | 2 | | Jul 2026 | Tome | 12.1K | 1.8% | 3 | | Jul 2026 | Decktopus | 4.4K | 0.64% | 4 | | Aug 2026 | Gamma | 550K | 82.8% | 1 | | Aug 2026 | Beautiful.ai | 100K | 15.1% | 2 | | Aug 2026 | Tome | 9.9K | 1.5% | 3 | | Aug 2026 | Decktopus | 4.4K | 0.66% | 4 | | Sep 2026 | Beautiful.ai | — | — | — | | Sep 2026 | Decktopus | — | — | — | | Sep 2026 | Gamma | — | — | — | | Sep 2026 | Tome | — | — | — | ## What is being compared - **Beautiful.ai**: Measured on the search terms “beautiful ai”, “beautiful.ai”, “beautiful.ai app”, “beautiful.ai presentation” and “beautiful.ai software”, summed into one figure. - **Decktopus**: Measured on the search term “decktopus”. - **Gamma**: Measured on the search term “gamma app”. - **Tome**: Measured on the search term “tome app”. - [Beautiful.ai](/demand/global-en/brands/beautiful-ai) - [Decktopus](/demand/global-en/brands/decktopus) - [Gamma](/demand/global-en/brands/gamma) - [Tome](/demand/global-en/brands/tome) ## Methodology - [How is branded search demand measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Which brand is most popular in search among AI presentation makers worldwide? In August 2026, Gamma was the most searched among AI presentation makers worldwide, with an estimated 550K branded searches and 82.8% estimated Share of Search within this set. These are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "AI presentation makers: Which brands are most popular in search?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/ai-presentation-makers This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/categories/ai-presentation-makers. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.