--- title: "Spond: search popularity worldwide" description: "Spond is a free app for organising sports teams, clubs and groups. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/brands/spond" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Spond: search popularity worldwide Spond is a free app for organising sports teams, clubs and groups. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Brand**: Spond - **Market**: Global - **Measured month**: Sep 2026 - **Share of Search among sports league management software**: 28.2% ## Where the brand sits | Competitive set | Rank | Share of Search | Estimated monthly branded searches | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Sports league management software | 2 | 28.2% | 246K | - [Sports league management software](/demand/global-en/categories/sports-league-management-software) ## Top sports league management software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Spond did not appear in any of the five answers. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | SportsEngine | 1st | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | LeagueApps | 2nd | 2 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | TeamSnap | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | TeamSideline | 4th | 1 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Jersey Watch | 5th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | PlayHQ | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Spond | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Pitchero | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | SportLoMo | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Demosphere | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Heja | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Stack Sports | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about sports league management software - Asked ChatGPT "Which sports league management software should I use?": 1. TeamSnap, 2. LeagueApps, 3. SportsEngine, 4. Jersey Watch - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best sports league management platforms?": 1. LeagueApps, 2. SportsEngine, 3. TeamSideline, 4. TeamSnap, 5. Jersey Watch - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best sports league management software for a youth soccer club?": 1. SportsEngine, 2. TeamSnap - Searched Google, AI Overview "sports league management software": 1. LeagueApps, 2. SportsEngine, 3. TeamSideline, 4. TeamSnap - Searched Google, AI Overview "youth sports software": 1. LeagueApps Not named in any answer: PlayHQ, Spond, Pitchero, SportLoMo, Demosphere, Heja and Stack Sports. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 22, 2026. ## How has branded search demand for Spond changed worldwide over the last 12 months? - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Spond worldwide rose from 201K to 246K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Spond’s share of searches among sports league management software worldwide increased from 19.1% to 28.2%. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Spond’s share of searches among sports league management software worldwide peaked at 28.2% in September 2026 and was lowest at 18.7% in May 2026. ## How did search popularity change for sports league management software worldwide in September 2026? - In September 2026, Pitchero overtook LeagueApps to rank 5th among sports league management software worldwide, with 2.1% of the searches. - In September 2026, SportLoMo overtook LeagueApps and TeamSideline to rank 6th among sports league management software worldwide, with 2.1% of the searches. - In September 2026, Spond gained share of searches among sports league management software worldwide, from 20.1% to 28.2%. - In September 2026, SportsEngine gained share of searches among sports league management software worldwide, from 9.1% to 12.6%. - In September 2026, TeamSnap gained share of searches among sports league management software worldwide, from 20.1% to 23.1%. - In September 2026, PlayHQ lost share of searches among sports league management software worldwide, from 45% to 28.2%. ## Historical estimated branded-search demand | Month | Competitive set | Estimated monthly branded searches | Share of Search | Rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | Sports league management software | 201K | 19.1% | 2 | | Nov 2025 | Sports league management software | 201K | 21% | 2 | | Dec 2025 | Sports league management software | 165K | 23.4% | 2 | | Jan 2026 | Sports league management software | 201K | 25.4% | 2 | | Feb 2026 | Sports league management software | 201K | 22.4% | 2 | | Mar 2026 | Sports league management software | 201K | 21.4% | 2 | | Apr 2026 | Sports league management software | 201K | 20.4% | 2 | | May 2026 | Sports league management software | 201K | 18.7% | 2 | | Jun 2026 | Sports league management software | 165K | 20.5% | 2 | | Jul 2026 | Sports league management software | 165K | 23.3% | 2 | | Aug 2026 | Sports league management software | 201K | 20.1% | 2 | | Sep 2026 | Sports league management software | 246K | 28.2% | 2 | ## How are Spond’s branded searches counted? Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Spond’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading. - “spond” ## Which sports league management software compete with Spond? - [PlayHQ](/demand/global-en/brands/playhq): Head-to-head: /demand/global-en/compare/playhq-vs-spond - [TeamSnap](/demand/global-en/brands/teamsnap): Head-to-head: /demand/global-en/compare/spond-vs-teamsnap - [SportsEngine](/demand/global-en/brands/sportsengine): Head-to-head: /demand/global-en/compare/spond-vs-sportsengine - [Pitchero](/demand/global-en/brands/pitchero): Head-to-head: /demand/global-en/compare/pitchero-vs-spond - [SportLoMo](/demand/global-en/brands/sportlomo): Head-to-head: /demand/global-en/compare/spond-vs-sportlomo - [TeamSideline](/demand/global-en/brands/teamsideline) - [LeagueApps](/demand/global-en/brands/leagueapps) - [Demosphere](/demand/global-en/brands/demosphere) - [Heja](/demand/global-en/brands/heja) - [Stack Sports](/demand/global-en/brands/stack-sports) - [Jersey Watch](/demand/global-en/brands/jersey-watch) ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Spond: search popularity worldwide". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/brands/spond This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/brands/spond. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.