---
title: "NumWorks: search popularity worldwide"
description: "NumWorks makes graphing calculators. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time."
canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/brands/numworks"
publisher: "Brandwave"
---

# NumWorks: search popularity worldwide

NumWorks makes graphing calculators. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.

## Key facts

- **Brand**: NumWorks
- **Market**: Global
- **Measured month**: Sep 2026
- **Share of Search among calculator brands**: 55.7%

## Where the brand sits

| Competitive set | Rank | Share of Search | Estimated monthly branded searches |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Calculator brands | 1 | 55.7% | 368K |

- [Calculator brands](/demand/global-en/categories/calculator-brands)

## Top calculator brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, NumWorks was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. NumWorks is the sixth most recommended of the seven.

Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options.

| Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Casio | 1st | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 |
| Texas Instruments | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 |
| Sharp | 3rd | 2 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 4 of 5 |
| HP | 4th | 2 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 3 of 5 |
| Canon | 5th | 1 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 3 of 5 |
| NumWorks | 6th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 |
| Citizen | 7th | 0 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 1 of 5 |

## Every AI answer about calculator brands

- Asked ChatGPT "Which calculator brand should I buy?": 1. Texas Instruments, 2. Casio, 3. HP
- Asked ChatGPT "What are the best calculator brands?": 1. Texas Instruments, 2. Casio, 3. HP, 4. Sharp, 5. NumWorks
- Asked ChatGPT "What's the best calculator brand for school and office work?": 1. Casio, 2. Texas Instruments, 3. Canon, 4. Sharp
- Searched Google, AI Overview "calculator brands": 1. Texas Instruments, 2. Casio, 3. HP, 4. Canon, 5. Sharp, 6. Citizen
- Searched Google, AI Overview "calculator for office": 1. Casio, 2. Sharp, 3. Canon

Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 20, 2026.

## How has branded search demand for NumWorks changed worldwide over the last 12 months?

- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for NumWorks worldwide rose from 246K to 368K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, NumWorks’ share of searches among calculator brands worldwide increased from 45.7% to 55.7%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, NumWorks’ share of searches among calculator brands worldwide peaked at 55.7% in September 2026 and was lowest at 14.3% in July 2026.

## How did search popularity change for calculator brands worldwide in September 2026?

- In September 2026, NumWorks overtook Texas Instruments to become the leader among calculator brands worldwide, with 55.7% of the searches.
- In September 2026, Texas Instruments lost share of searches among calculator brands worldwide, from 66.8% to 37.3%.
- In September 2026, Citizen lost share of searches among calculator brands worldwide, from 4% to 1.8%.
- In September 2026, HP lost share of searches among calculator brands worldwide, from 3.3% to 1.8%.
- In September 2026, Casio lost share of searches among calculator brands worldwide, from 1.8% to 0.82%.
- In September 2026, Canon lost share of searches among calculator brands worldwide, from 1.8% to 1%.

## Historical estimated branded-search demand

| Month | Competitive set | Estimated monthly branded searches | Share of Search | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oct 2025 | Calculator brands | 246K | 45.7% | 1 |
| Nov 2025 | Calculator brands | 301K | 55.2% | 1 |
| Dec 2025 | Calculator brands | 246K | 50.9% | 1 |
| Jan 2026 | Calculator brands | 301K | 55% | 1 |
| Feb 2026 | Calculator brands | 201K | 45.4% | 1 |
| Mar 2026 | Calculator brands | 301K | 55.4% | 1 |
| Apr 2026 | Calculator brands | 201K | 45.5% | 1 |
| May 2026 | Calculator brands | 246K | 46.2% | 1 |
| Jun 2026 | Calculator brands | 135K | 36.1% | 2 |
| Jul 2026 | Calculator brands | 40.5K | 14.3% | 2 |
| Aug 2026 | Calculator brands | 74K | 20.1% | 2 |
| Sep 2026 | Calculator brands | 368K | 55.7% | 1 |

## How are NumWorks’ branded searches counted?

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using NumWorks’ name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.

- “numworks”

## Which calculator brands compete with NumWorks?

- [Texas Instruments](/demand/global-en/brands/texas-instruments): Head-to-head: /demand/global-en/compare/numworks-vs-texas-instruments
- [Citizen](/demand/global-en/brands/citizen): Head-to-head: /demand/global-en/compare/citizen-vs-numworks
- [HP](/demand/global-en/brands/hp): Head-to-head: /demand/global-en/compare/hp-vs-numworks
- [Sharp](/demand/global-en/brands/sharp-electronics): Head-to-head: /demand/global-en/compare/numworks-vs-sharp-electronics
- [Canon](/demand/global-en/brands/canon): Head-to-head: /demand/global-en/compare/canon-vs-numworks
- [Casio](/demand/global-en/brands/casio)

## Methodology

- [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused.

## Cite this page

Brandwave. "NumWorks: search popularity worldwide". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/brands/numworks

This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/brands/numworks. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.
