--- title: "Mirabella vs Nanoleaf: Which is searched more in Australia?" description: "Is Mirabella or Nanoleaf more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Smart lighting brands set in Australia. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/au/compare/mirabella-vs-nanoleaf" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Mirabella vs Nanoleaf: Which is searched more in Australia? Is Mirabella or Nanoleaf more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Smart lighting brands set in Australia. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: Mirabella and Nanoleaf - **Competitive set**: Smart lighting brands - **Market**: Australia - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **Mirabella Share of Search**: 7.9% - **Nanoleaf Share of Search**: 7.9% ## Is Mirabella or Nanoleaf more popular in search? - In September 2026, Mirabella and Nanoleaf were level in searches among smart lighting brands in Australia, with an estimated 3.6K branded searches each, at 7.9% of the total each. - Mirabella was ahead of Nanoleaf in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Mirabella’s share of searches among smart lighting brands in Australia moved from 9.3% to 7.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 4.4K to 3.6K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Nanoleaf’s share of searches among smart lighting brands in Australia moved from 6.1% to 7.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 2.9K to 3.6K. ## Top smart lighting brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Nanoleaf was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Mirabella did not appear in any of the five answers. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | TP-Link Tapo | 1st | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | Philips Hue | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | WiZ | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | LIFX | 4th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Nanoleaf | 5th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Govee | 6th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 | | Mirabella | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about smart lighting brands - Asked ChatGPT "Which smart bulbs should I buy in Australia?": 1. TP-Link Tapo, 2. Philips Hue, 3. WiZ - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best smart lighting brands in Australia?": 1. Philips Hue, 2. TP-Link Tapo, 3. LIFX, 4. Govee, 5. Nanoleaf, 6. WiZ - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best smart lights for a home without a hub?": 1. TP-Link Tapo, 2. WiZ, 3. LIFX, 4. Philips Hue, 5. Nanoleaf - Searched Google, AI Overview "smart lights": 1. TP-Link Tapo, 2. Philips Hue - Searched Google, AI Overview "smart bulbs": 1. TP-Link Tapo, 2. Philips Hue Not named in any answer: Mirabella. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in Australia on October 26, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for Australia smart lighting brands in September 2026? - In September 2026, Mirabella gained share of searches among smart lighting brands in Australia, from 7% to 7.9%. - In September 2026, Nanoleaf gained share of searches among smart lighting brands in Australia, from 7% to 7.9%. ## Month by month | Month | Mirabella estimated searches | Mirabella Share of Search | Mirabella rank | Nanoleaf estimated searches | Nanoleaf Share of Search | Nanoleaf rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 4.4K | 9.3% | 3 | 2.9K | 6.1% | 4 | | Nov 2025 | 4.4K | 8.5% | 3 | 4.4K | 8.5% | 4 | | Dec 2025 | 5.4K | 11.7% | 3 | 5.4K | 11.7% | 4 | | Jan 2026 | 4.4K | 10.4% | 3 | 4.4K | 10.4% | 4 | | Feb 2026 | 3.6K | 9.6% | 3 | 2.9K | 7.7% | 4 | | Mar 2026 | 4.4K | 9.9% | 3 | 3.6K | 8.1% | 4 | | Apr 2026 | 4.4K | 9.4% | 3 | 3.6K | 7.7% | 4 | | May 2026 | 4.4K | 9% | 3 | 3.6K | 7.4% | 4 | | Jun 2026 | 4.4K | 9% | 3 | 3.6K | 7.4% | 4 | | Jul 2026 | 4.4K | 7.9% | 3 | 4.4K | 7.9% | 4 | | Aug 2026 | 4.4K | 7% | 3 | 4.4K | 7% | 4 | | Sep 2026 | 3.6K | 7.9% | 3 | 3.6K | 7.9% | 4 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Mirabella’s and Nanoleaf’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **Mirabella**: Measured on the search term “mirabella genio”. - **Nanoleaf**: Measured on the search term “nanoleaf”. - [Mirabella profile](/demand/au/brands/mirabella) - [Nanoleaf profile](/demand/au/brands/nanoleaf) - [All smart lighting brands in Australia](/demand/au/categories/au-smart-lighting-brands): The set both shares are measured inside, 7 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is Mirabella or Nanoleaf more popular in search? In September 2026, Mirabella and Nanoleaf were level in searches among smart lighting brands in Australia, with an estimated 3.6K branded searches each, at 7.9% of the total each. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Mirabella vs Nanoleaf: Which is searched more in Australia?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/au/compare/mirabella-vs-nanoleaf This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/au/compare/mirabella-vs-nanoleaf. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.